New Album

We’ve chosen Pledge Music to raise the funds necessary to record our new album.

By making a pledge, you will facilitate the recording, mixing, and mastering of our music and also get a behind the scenes look into the process exclusive only to our pledgers. There are lots more benefits and rewards for additional donations that you must check out on our Pledge Music page – PLUS, don’t forget, with the minimum donation ($10-$15) you will be pre-ordering the NEXT GIRLS & BOYS ALBUM!!

We are excited to share our journey with you every step of the way!! Every pledge gets us that much closer to our goal. We look forward to getting more of Girls & Boys music into your hands. Our music has taken us quite the distance so far… and we’re not done yet!! We truly believe in the communal aspect of music and understand that without you we would not be where we are now. Join us in making the album of our dreams!! With love and thanks, Girls & Boys

Comments 1

  1. ?How to write down a Critical Book Examination
    Your examine should have two goals: primary, to inform the reader about the content for the book, and second, to furnish an evaluation that gives your judgment from the book’s high-quality.
    Your introduction should include an overview from the book that both equally incorporates an encapsulated summary together with a feeling of your general judgment. This is the equivalent to some thesis statement.
    Do NOT spend even more than one-third or so within the paper summarizing the book. The summary should consist of the discussion and highlights within the major arguments, characteristics, trends, concepts, themes, ideas, and characteristics of your book. At the same time you may use direct quotes from the book (make sure you always give the web page amount), these kinds of quotes should never be the bulk from the summary. A good deal of your grade will depend on how properly you describe and explain the material In your own Individual WORDS. You would likely prefer to take the major organizing themes from the book and use them to organize your possess discussion. This does NOT mean, however, that I want a chapter-by-chapter summary. Your goal can be a unified essay.
    So what do I want, if not just a summary? Throughout your summary, I want you to definitely give a critique for the book. (Hence the title: “A Critical Book Analysis.”) A critique consists of thoughts, responses, and reactions. It is absolutely not necessarily negative. Nor do you will want to know as a good deal about the subject given that the author (simply because you hardly ever will). The skills you want are an ability to follow an argument and check a hypothesis. Regardless of how negative or positive your critique is, you absolutely need to be able to justify and aid your position.
    Listed here are a lot of questions you can address as part of your critique. You will want not answer them all, but questions just one and two are essential to any book critique, so those must be included. And these are ABSOLUTELY NOT to be answered one particular after another ( seriatim ). Never have an individual paragraph that answers just one, and then the next paragraph that answers the next, etc. The answers should be part of the carefully constructed essay, entire with topic sentences and transitions.
    1. What is your overall opinion with the book? On what basis has this opinion been formulated? That is certainly, tell the reader what you think and how you arrived at this judgment. What did you expect to learn in case you picked up the book? To what extent – and how effectively – ended up your expectations met? Did you nod in agreement (or off to sleep)? Did you would like you could talk again to the author? Amplify upon and explain your reactions.
    two. Identify the author’s thesis and explain it inside your have words. How clearly and in what context is it stated and, subsequently, developed? To what extent and how effectively (i.e. with what kind of evidence) is this thesis proven? Use examples to amplify your responses. If arguments or perspectives ended up missing, why do you think this may well be?
    3. What are the author’s aims? How very well have they been achieved, mainly with regard to the way the book is organized? Are these aims supported or justified? (You may well look and feel back again within the introduction to the book for help). How closely does the organization follow the author’s aims?
    four. How are the author’s main points presented, explained, and supported? What assumptions lie behind these points? What would be by far the most effective way for you to definitely compress and/or reorder the author’s scheme of presentation and argument?
    5. How effectively does the author draw statements from the material being presented? Are connections amongst the statements and evidence made clearly and logically? Right here you should definitely use examples to service your evaluation.
    6. What conclusions does the author access and how clearly are they stated? Do these conclusions follow from the thesis and aims and from the ways in which they had been developed? In other words, how effectively does the book come together?
    7. Identify the assumptions made by the author in each the strategy to additionally, the creating belonging to the book. For example, what prior knowledge does the author expect readers to possess? How effectively are those assumptions worked into the overall presentation? What assumptions do you think should not have been made? Why?
    8. Are you able to detect any underlying philosophy of history held by the author (e.g. progress, decline, cyclical, linear, and random)? If so, how does this philosophy affect the presentation from the argument?
    9. How does the author see history as being motivated: primarily by the forces of individuals, economics, politics, social factors, nationalism, class, race, gender, something else? What kind of impact does this perspective of historical motivation have upon the way in which the author develops the book?
    ten. Does the author’s presentation seem to be fair and accurate? Is the interpretation biased? Can you detect any distortion, exaggeration, or diminishing of material? If so, for what purpose can this have been done, and what effect does hit have within the overall presentation?
    These questions are derived from Robert Blackey, “Words to the Whys: Crafting Critical Book Reviews,” The History Teacher, 27.two (Feb. 1994): 159-66. essay help service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.